A SOCIAL JUSTICE BLOG SITE OF THE AMERICAN CREOLE INDIAN NATION

Sunday, March 7, 2010

The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics















The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics

By Edwin Black

Mr. Black is the author of IBM and the Holocaust and the just released War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race, from which the following article is drawn.




























Hitler and his henchmen victimized an entire continent and exterminated millions in his quest for a so-called "Master Race."


But the concept of a white, blond-haired, blue-eyed master Nordic race didn't originate with Hitler. The idea was created in the United States, and cultivated in California, decades before Hitler came to power. California eugenicists played an important, although little known, role in the American eugenics movement's campaign for ethnic cleansing.


Eugenics was the racist pseudoscience determined to wipe away all human beings deemed "unfit," preserving only those who conformed to a Nordic stereotype. Elements of the philosophy were enshrined as national policy by forced sterilization and segregation laws, as well as marriage restrictions, enacted in twenty-seven states. In 1909, California became the third state to adopt such laws. Ultimately, eugenics practitioners coercively sterilized some 60,000 Americans, barred the marriage of thousands, forcibly segregated thousands in "colonies," and persecuted untold numbers in ways we are just learning. Before World War II, nearly half of coercive sterilizations were done in California, and even after the war, the state accounted for a third of all such surgeries.


California was considered an epicenter of the American eugenics movement. During the Twentieth Century's first decades, California's eugenicists included potent but little known race scientists, such as Army venereal disease specialist Dr. Paul Popenoe, citrus magnate and Polytechnic benefactor Paul Gosney, Sacramento banker Charles M. Goethe, as well as members of the California State Board of Charities and Corrections and the University of California Board of Regents.


Eugenics would have been so much bizarre parlor talk had it not been for extensive financing by corporate philanthropies, specifically the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Harriman railroad fortune. They were all in league with some of America's most respected scientists hailing from such prestigious universities as Stanford, Yale, Harvard, and Princeton. These academics espoused race theory and race science, and then faked and twisted data to serve eugenics' racist aims.


Stanford president David Starr Jordan originated the notion of "race and blood" in his 1902 racial epistle "Blood of a Nation," in which the university scholar declared that human qualities and conditions such as talent and poverty were passed through the blood.


In 1904, the Carnegie Institution established a laboratory complex at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island that stockpiled millions of index cards on ordinary Americans, as researchers carefully plotted the removal of families, bloodlines and whole peoples. From Cold Spring Harbor, eugenics advocates agitated in the legislatures of America, as well as the nation's social service agencies and associations.


The Harriman railroad fortune paid local charities, such as the New York Bureau of Industries and Immigration, to seek out Jewish, Italian and other immigrants in New York and other crowded cities and subject them to deportation, trumped up confinement or forced sterilization.


The Rockefeller Foundation helped found the German eugenics program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz.


Much of the spiritual guidance and political agitation for the American eugenics movement came from California's quasi-autonomous eugenic societies, such as the Pasadena-based Human Betterment Foundation and the California branch of the American Eugenics Society, which coordinated much of their activity with the Eugenics Research Society in Long Island. These organizations--which functioned as part of a closely-knit network--published racist eugenic newsletters and pseudoscientific journals, such as Eugenical News and Eugenics, and propagandized for the Nazis.


Eugenics was born as a scientific curiosity in the Victorian age. In 1863, Sir Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin, theorized that if talented people only married other talented people, the result would be measurably better offspring. At the turn of the last century, Galton's ideas were imported into the United States just as Gregor Mendel's principles of heredity were rediscovered. American eugenic advocates believed with religious fervor that the same Mendelian concepts determining the color and size of peas, corn and cattle also governed the social and intellectual character of man.


In an America demographically reeling from immigration upheaval and torn by post-Reconstruction chaos, race conflict was everywhere in the early twentieth century. Elitists, utopians and so-called "progressives" fused their smoldering race fears and class bias with their desire to make a better world. They reinvented Galton's eugenics into a repressive and racist ideology. The intent: populate the earth with vastly more of their own socio-economic and biological kind--and less or none of everyone else.


The superior species the eugenics movement sought was populated not merely by tall, strong, talented people. Eugenicists craved blond, blue-eyed Nordic types. This group alone, they believed, was fit to inherit the earth. In the process, the movement intended to subtract emancipated Negroes, immigrant Asian laborers, Indians, Hispanics, East Europeans, Jews, dark-haired hill folk, poor people, the infirm and really anyone classified outside the gentrified genetic lines drawn up by American raceologists.


How? By identifying so-called "defective" family trees and subjecting them to lifelong segregation and sterilization programs to kill their bloodlines. The grand plan was to literally wipe away the reproductive capability of those deemed weak and inferior--the so-called "unfit." The eugenicists hoped to neutralize the viability of 10 percent of the population at a sweep, until none were left except themselves.


Eighteen solutions were explored in a Carnegie-supported 1911 "Preliminary Report of the Committee of the Eugenic Section of the American Breeder's Association to Study and to Report on the Best Practical Means for Cutting Off the Defective Germ-Plasm in the Human Population." Point eight was euthanasia.


The most commonly suggested method of eugenicide in America was a "lethal chamber" or public locally operated gas chambers. In 1918, Popenoe, the Army venereal disease specialist during World War I, co-wrote the widely used textbook, Applied Eugenics, which argued, "From an historical point of view, the first method which presents itself is execution… Its value in keeping up the standard of the race should not be underestimated." Applied Eugenics also devoted a chapter to "Lethal Selection," which operated "through the destruction of the individual by some adverse feature of the environment, such as excessive cold, or bacteria, or by bodily deficiency."


Eugenic breeders believed American society was not ready to implement an organized lethal solution. But many mental institutions and doctors practiced improvised medical lethality and passive euthanasia on their own. One institution in Lincoln, Illinois fed its incoming patients milk from tubercular cows believing a eugenically strong individual would be immune. Thirty to forty percent annual death rates resulted at Lincoln. Some doctors practiced passive eugenicide one newborn infant at a time. Others doctors at mental institutions engaged in lethal neglect.


Nonetheless, with eugenicide marginalized, the main solution for eugenicists was the rapid expansion of forced segregation and sterilization, as well as more marriage restrictions. California led the nation, performing nearly all sterilization procedures with little or no due process. In its first twenty-five years of eugenic legislation, California sterilized 9,782 individuals, mostly women. Many were classified as "bad girls," diagnosed as "passionate," "oversexed" or "sexually wayward." At Sonoma, some women were sterilized because of what was deemed an abnormally large clitoris or labia.


In 1933 alone, at least 1,278 coercive sterilizations were performed, 700 of which were on women. The state's two leading sterilization mills in 1933 were Sonoma State Home with 388 operations and Patton State Hospital with 363 operations. Other sterilization centers included Agnews, Mendocino, Napa, Norwalk, Stockton and Pacific Colony state hospitals.


Even the United States Supreme Court endorsed aspects of eugenics. In its infamous 1927 decision, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, "It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind…. Three generations of imbeciles are enough." This decision opened the floodgates for thousands to be coercively sterilized or otherwise persecuted as subhuman. Years later, the Nazis at the Nuremberg trials quoted Holmes's words in their own defense.


Only after eugenics became entrenched in the United States was the campaign transplanted into Germany, in no small measure through the efforts of California eugenicists, who published booklets idealizing sterilization and circulated them to German official and scientists.


Hitler studied American eugenics laws. He tried to legitimize his anti-Semitism by medicalizing it, and wrapping it in the more palatable pseudoscientific facade of eugenics. Hitler was able to recruit more followers among reasonable Germans by claiming that science was on his side. While Hitler's race hatred sprung from his own mind, the intellectual outlines of the eugenics Hitler adopted in 1924 were made in America.


During the '20s, Carnegie Institution eugenic scientists cultivated deep personal and professional relationships with Germany's fascist eugenicists. In Mein Kampf, published in 1924, Hitler quoted American eugenic ideology and openly displayed a thorough knowledge of American eugenics. "There is today one state," wrote Hitler, "in which at least weak beginnings toward a better conception [of immigration] are noticeable. Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States."


Hitler proudly told his comrades just how closely he followed the progress of the American eugenics movement. "I have studied with great interest," he told a fellow Nazi, "the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock."


Hitler even wrote a fan letter to American eugenic leader Madison Grant calling his race-based eugenics book, The Passing of the Great Race his "bible."


Hitler's struggle for a superior race would be a mad crusade for a Master Race. Now, the American term "Nordic" was freely exchanged with "Germanic" or "Aryan." Race science, racial purity and racial dominance became the driving force behind Hitler's Nazism. Nazi eugenics would ultimately dictate who would be persecuted in a Reich-dominated Europe, how people would live, and how they would die. Nazi doctors would become the unseen generals in Hitler's war against the Jews and other Europeans deemed inferior. Doctors would create the science, devise the eugenic formulas, and even hand-select the victims for sterilization, euthanasia and mass extermination.


During the Reich's early years, eugenicists across America welcomed Hitler's plans as the logical fulfillment of their own decades of research and effort. California eugenicists republished Nazi propaganda for American consumption. They also arranged for Nazi scientific exhibits, such as an August 1934 display at the L.A. County Museum, for the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association.


In 1934, as Germany's sterilizations were accelerating beyond 5,000 per month, the California eugenics leader C. M. Goethe upon returning from Germany ebulliently bragged to a key colleague, "You will be interested to know, that your work has played a powerful part in shaping the opinions of the group of intellectuals who are behind Hitler in this epoch-making program. Everywhere I sensed that their opinions have been tremendously stimulated by American thought.…I want you, my dear friend, to carry this thought with you for the rest of your life, that you have really jolted into action a great government of 60 million people."


That same year, ten years, after Virginia passed its sterilization act, Joseph DeJarnette, superintendent of Virginia's Western State Hospital, observed in the Richmond Times-Dispatch, "The Germans are beating us at our own game."


More than just providing the scientific roadmap, America funded Germany's eugenic institutions. By 1926, Rockefeller had donated some $410,000 -- almost $4 million in 21st-Century money -- to hundreds of German researchers. In May 1926, Rockefeller awarded $250,000 to the German Psychiatric Institute of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, later to become the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry. Among the leading psychiatrists at the German Psychiatric Institute was Ernst Rüdin, who became director and eventually an architect of Hitler's systematic medical repression.


Another in the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute's eugenic complex of institutions was the Institute for Brain Research. Since 1915, it had operated out of a single room. Everything changed when Rockefeller money arrived in 1929. A grant of $317,000 allowed the Institute to construct a major building and take center stage in German race biology. The Institute received additional grants from the Rockefeller Foundation during the next several years. Leading the Institute, once again, was Hitler's medical henchman Ernst Rüdin. Rüdin's organization became a prime director and recipient of the murderous experimentation and research conducted on Jews, Gypsies and others.


Beginning in 1940, thousands of Germans taken from old age homes, mental institutions and other custodial facilities were systematically gassed. Between 50,000 and 100,000 were eventually killed.


Leon Whitney, executive secretary of the American Eugenics Society declared of Nazism, "While we were pussy-footing around…the Germans were calling a spade a spade."


A special recipient of Rockefeller funding was the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics in Berlin. For decades, American eugenicists had craved twins to advance their research into heredity. The Institute was now prepared to undertake such research on an unprecedented level. On May 13, 1932, the Rockefeller Foundation in New York dispatched a radiogram to its Paris office: JUNE MEETING EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE NINE THOUSAND DOLLARS OVER THREE YEAR PERIOD TO KWG INSTITUTE ANTHROPOLOGY FOR RESEARCH ON TWINS AND EFFECTS ON LATER GENERATIONS OF SUBSTANCES TOXIC FOR GERM PLASM.


At the time of Rockefeller's endowment, Otmar Freiherr von Verschuer, a hero in American eugenics circles, functioned as a head of the Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics. Rockefeller funding of that Institute continued both directly and through other research conduits during Verschuer's early tenure. In 1935, Verschuer left the Institute to form a rival eugenics facility in Frankfurt that was much heralded in the American eugenic press. Research on twins in the Third Reich exploded, backed up by government decrees. Verschuer wrote in Der Erbarzt, a eugenic doctor's journal he edited, that Germany's war would yield a "total solution to the Jewish problem."


Verschuer had a long-time assistant. His name was Josef Mengele. On May 30, 1943, Mengele arrived at Auschwitz. Verschuer notified the German Research Society, "My assistant, Dr. Josef Mengele (M.D., Ph.D.) joined me in this branch of research. He is presently employed as Hauptsturmführer [captain] and camp physician in the Auschwitz concentration camp. Anthropological testing of the most diverse racial groups in this concentration camp is being carried out with permission of the SS Reichsführer [Himmler]."


Mengele began searching the boxcar arrivals for twins. When he found them, he performed beastly experiments, scrupulously wrote up the reports and sent the paperwork back to Verschuer's institute for evaluation. Often, cadavers, eyes and other body parts were also dispatched to Berlin's eugenic institutes.


Rockefeller executives never knew of Mengele. With few exceptions, the foundation had ceased all eugenic studies in Nazi-occupied Europe before the war erupted in 1939. But by that time the die had been cast. The talented men Rockefeller and Carnegie financed, the institutions they helped found, and the science it helped create took on a scientific momentum of their own.


After the war, eugenics was declared a crime against humanity--an act of genocide. Germans were tried and they cited the California statutes in their defense. To no avail. They were found guilty.


However, Mengele's boss Verschuer escaped prosecution. Verschuer re-established his connections with California eugenicists who had gone underground and renamed their crusade "human genetics." Typical was an exchange July 25, 1946 when Popenoe wrote Verschuer, "It was indeed a pleasure to hear from you again. I have been very anxious about my colleagues in Germany…. I suppose sterilization has been discontinued in Germany?" Popenoe offered tidbits about various American eugenic luminaries and then sent various eugenic publications. In a separate package, Popenoe sent some cocoa, coffee and other goodies.


Verschuer wrote back, "Your very friendly letter of 7/25 gave me a great deal of pleasure and you have my heartfelt thanks for it. The letter builds another bridge between your and my scientific work; I hope that this bridge will never again collapse but rather make possible valuable mutual enrichment and stimulation."


Soon, Verschuer once again became a respected scientist in Germany and around the world. In 1949, he became a corresponding member of the newly formed American Society of Human Genetics, organized by American eugenicists and geneticists.


In the fall of 1950, the University of Münster offered Verschuer a position at its new Institute of Human Genetics, where he later became a dean. In the early and mid-1950s, Verschuer became an honorary member of numerous prestigious societies, including the Italian Society of Genetics, the Anthropological Society of Vienna, and the Japanese Society for Human Genetics.


Human genetics' genocidal roots in eugenics were ignored by a victorious generation that refused to link itself to the crimes of Nazism and by succeeding generations that never knew the truth of the years leading up to war. Now governors of five states, including California have issued public apologies to their citizens, past and present, for sterilization and other abuses spawned by the eugenics movement.


Human genetics became an enlightened endeavor in the late twentieth century. Hard-working, devoted scientists finally cracked the human code through the Human Genome Project. Now, every individual can be biologically identified and classified by trait and ancestry. Yet even now, some leading voices in the genetic world are calling for a cleansing of the unwanted among us, and even a master human species.


There is understandable wariness about more ordinary forms of abuse, for example, in denying insurance or employment based on genetic tests. On October 14, America's first genetic anti-discrimination legislation passed the Senate by unanimous vote. Yet because genetics research is global, no single nation's law can stop the threats.


This article was first published in the San Francisco Chronicle.


Friday, March 5, 2010

RARE Window Into The Difference Between "Pro per" vs. "Pro se" In Court

Don't say 'dat Creoles never taught you nothing!




I will limit my answer strictly to the question regarding the difference between "Pro Se" and "Pro Per." Quite frankly I am stunned by the previous answers. Both of which, while not actually wrong, are not in fact answering the question. To wit; THERE IS a very substantial legal difference between proceeding "pro per" (or "in pro per" or "in propria persona") and proceeding "pro se" (or "in pro se"). Understanding of these two terms is critical, especially pertaining to personam jurisdiction. 


There are two types of jurisdiction: "personam" and "subject matter" and a court needs to clearly have jurisdiction of both in order to hear a case for or against you.


Personam jurisdiction gives a court the authority over your person or you as an individual in order to hear or try a case involving you.


Subject matter jurisdiction gives a court the authority over the thing, issue, or activity (i.e. negotiable instrument, car collision, injury to person or property, alleged crime, etc. alleged in a complaint) in order to hear or try a case involving you.


Believe it or not, use of the wrong legal phrase can sabotage you, jurisdiction-wise.


Okay, let's look at the two terms in detail and in depth.


"In propria persona." In one's own proper person. It was formerly a rule of pleading that pleas to the jurisdiction of the court must be plead in propria persona, because if pleaded by attorney they admit the jurisdiction, as an attorney is an officer of the court, and he is presumed to plead after having obtained leave (permission), which admits the jurisdiction. See Pro se. Black's Law Dictionary, 5th edition, pg. 712


"Pro se." For himself; in his own behalf; in person. Appearing for oneself, as in the case of one who does not retain a lawyer and appears for himself in court. Black's Law Dictionary, 5th edition, pg. 1099


Appearing "pro se" is not the same as appearing "in propria persona" as one appearing "pro se" is serving as his own attorney and thereby granting the court jurisdiction (personam jurisdiction) as all attorneys are officers of the court. As you saw in the definition of "in propria persona" above, when attorneys plead for you, they automatically admit the jurisdiction (court's authority). Attorneys are agents of the court that are used to give the court automatic jurisdiction. That's why you are always told to get an attorney for your court action and not usually for the reasons you are lead to believe; in short it's because they are officers of the court and automatically give the court authority over you and this makes things easier for the judge.


If you or any one else wishes to argue the above points I first ask that you obtain a copy of Blacks Law Dictionary Fith edition and look it up for yourself. The Black's Law Dictionary, 5th edition, definition provides us with crucial information, especially if we are to argue jurisdiction. You see, before a court can proceed with an action against you or involving you, be it civil or criminal, jurisdiction (personam and subject matter) must be established on the court's record and this is black letter law.


"The law requires proof of jurisdiction to appear on the record of the administrative agency and all administrative proceedings." Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 533


"The record must show affirmatively that the jurisdictional requirements have been satisfied." Hayman v. L.A., 17 Cal.App.2d. 674


"Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it must be proved to exist." Stuck v. Medical Examiners, 94 Ca2d 751, 211 P2d 389


"Jurisdiction may never be assumed, not even by colorable claims or status or black robes or officialdom or appearances, but must be substantively proven by the plaintiff/claimant of said jurisdiction. Once challenged by any proper party the plaintiff/complaint must prove their jurisdiction in a timely manner." McNutt v General Motors Acceptance Corp., 56 S.Ct. 502


ASST. CITY MGR OF LITTLE ROCK- INSTITUTIONAL RACIST







This is the eugenic story of a corrupt institutional racist called
Assistant City Manager Bryan Day.





That's right folks, tune in soon to hear an undeniable story of Jim Crow Corruption starring former River Market Manager Supervisor & currently redundantly serving as Assistant City Mgr. Bryan Day Of










The City Of Little Rock.




PLEASE MAKE ME PROVE YOUR CORRUPTION & PERJURY AGAINST MY NATION SIR. IT WOULD BE MY ABSOLUTE CREOLE PLEASURE. YOU HAVE HIDDEN BEHIND THAT WONDERFUL HEALTH CARE PLAN TOO LONG & FOR WHAT? WE DON'T EVEN N-E-E-D YOU IN THIS CITY. WE HAVE B-O-T-H: M-A-Y-O-R & CITY MANAGER. WE DON'T NEED NO MO' CHIEFS, ESPECIALLY ODD OBSTRUCTIONISTS LIKE YOURSELF, THAT CLAIM RIVER MARKETS ARE SUPPOSED TO LOSE MONEY!!!!






MY PEOPLE WILL SUFFER NO LONGER BY YOUR RACIALIST EUGENIC/OBSTRUCTIONIST HAND. YOUR PATTERN IS AS OBVIOUS AS THE JIM CROW HIGH SCHOOL YOU GRADUATED FROM- YOUR RACIST PATTERN IS OBVIOUS.


YOU SIR ARE THE EPITOME OF BUREAUCRATIC REDUNDANCY AND THE TRUE BLIGHT UPON OUR BELEAGUERED ECONOMY. YOUR HEALTH CARE PLAN COULD PROBABLY KEEP AT LEAST THREE OF OUR TRIBE MEMBERS HEALTHY, YET YOU THINK YOU CAN CONTINUE TO SPIT IN OUR FACE WITHOUT CONSEQUENCE. WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH OF YOUR MISFEASANCE.



YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED.





YOU ARE IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF OUR SACRED SOVEREIGNTY'S & PROTECTED RIGHT TO SELF- DETERMINATION.







THE PEOPLE OF THIS INHERITANCE LAND HAVE SPOKEN TO YOU TRUE AND FINAL.







THE CHIEF ELDER, AMERICAN CREOLE INDIAN NATION




Here is a little background on the malfeasant perjuring Anti-Creole & Institutional Racist:
















Little Rock, AR (3 October 2005) After conducting a national search, City Manager Bruce Moore today announced the selection of Little Rock Parks and Recreation Director Bryan Day to be the next Assistant City Manager . Day has been serving as Interim Assistant City Manager since March of this year. He succeeds Bob Turner who retired earlier this year.



“I have worked closely with Bryan since we started at City Hall in the early 1990s,” Moore said. “With the Bob Turner’s retirement, I began searching for someone who understood the priorities of the Mayor and City Board of Directors as we maintain our commitment to the citizens of Little Rock . Through his involvement with this office, the Parks Department, and the 2004 Bond program, I knew that Bryan had the unique mix of skills I was seeking. His leadership, professionalism, and dedication to the City are outstanding. I look forward to continuing to work with him in this new role.”



“I am honored to have been asked by Bruce to move into this position on his team,” said Day. “The City of Little Rock has so much to offer. Since I joined City Hall, it has been my pleasure to interact with countless citizens on many issues. I look forward to new challenges and opportunities as we work together to make Little Rock an even better place to live and work.”





Day, a native of Little Rock , began at City Hall as an administrative operations manager in the City Manager ’s Office. After serving in administrative positions in that office, he was named Assistant Director of the Parks and Recreation Department in 1996. In 1999, Day was named Director of Parks and Recreation.



Under Day’s leadership, the Parks and Recreation Department achieved national accreditation. His tenure also saw the adoption of the system’s first comprehensive master plan in over 80 years. Other achievements include the development of the Arkansas River Trail, the opening of the Stephens Community Center , the creation of a Therapeutic Recreation program, the opening of the MacArthur Museum of Arkansas Military History, and the beginning of the Little Rock Marathon.



Prior to joining the City of Little Rock , Day worked for the Arkansas Department of Parks and Tourism. He holds both a Bachelor and a Master’s degree from the University of Arkansas at Little Rock . Day and his wife Betsy have two children, Sierra and Spencer.



Day has been involved in numerous community activities including Boy Scouts, YMCA, and City Year. He has served on the board of the National Recreation and Parks Association and is past president of the Arkansas Recreation and Parks Association. Earlier this year, Day was named Outstanding Public Administrator by the UALR Chapter of the American Society for Public Administration. In 2003, he was elected to the Little Rock School Board.
HERE IS EVEN MORE ON THE INSTITUTIONAL RACIST FROM THE LITTLE ROCK POLICE PENSION NEWS:


River Market Costs for the City of Little Rock

October 29th, 2009 Author:
sryoung

Police Pension Board Member Lee Harrod pointed out another article that I found very interesting in the
Arkansas Times. It was an article about the Little Rock City Board of Directors turning over the management of the Little Rock River Market to the Little Rock Convention and Visitors Bureau (LRCVB).



Now, my first question was, who is the LRCVB? Is it another tentacle of the City of Little Rock, a private organization, or what? Well, Google is your friend for such matters and I found out that it is a “publicly funded organization” (which means the taxpayers pay for it) and that it derives its funding from “a hotel and restaurant tax and the State of Arkansas” (quoted material found
here).



According to the article, the River Market has cost the City of Little Rock $1,220,143 in 2008 alone! That is the figure you get if you use the amount the city budgeted for 2008, add the amount they went over-budget for the River Market, and subtract the income from the rentals and parking fees generated by the River Market in 2008.



The figures are not complete for 2009 yet but the City increased its 2009 budget for the River Market to $946,703 and it has already been depleted and an additional cost of $188,041 has already been spent. There are three more months yet to go in this year but the total loss currently to the City is $1,134,744 now. The expected revenue from the rentals and parking fees was projected at $390,518 when the 2009 budget was proposed but I would bet it’s going to be substantially less due to the economic downturn.



Amazingly, but not surprisingly, City Treasurer Sara Lenehan stated the River Market has had to “borrow” $2,253,939 from the City’s general fund in the past 10 years after apparently depleting its budgeted funds. I believe the term “borrow” is inappropriate in her description given the fact that the River Market has posted another $2,623,480 in losses since January of 2008. The term “borrow” means a loan or something that must be paid back. Where is this “borrowed” money going to come from when the River Market losses continue to grow by staggering amounts year after year?



The article quotes Assistant City Manager Bryan Day as stating, “But the River Market shouldn’t be expected to pay for itself anymore than other parks in Little Rock — or nationally — do. The River Market is a public service.” Well, that statement, in my opinion, is incorrect. Who really believes the River Market is a “Park” other than Mr. Day? Who really believes the River Market is a “public service” rather than a collection of bars, restaurants, and novelty shops other than Mr. Day? I believe any public project should be capable of paying for itself in some fashion or be something vital to the public health and welfare of a community. If not, that project is not a “public service”; it is a “public luxury” that no government should have the right to ask its citizens to sustain financially. Thus, those who utilize the Farmers Market should be expected to pay for the Farmers Market.



Once again, this demonstrates the flawed priorities of city government in the City of Little Rock.

Posted in
City Budget/Pension Fund


Bryan day Bryan day Bryan day Bryan day corruption sucks corrupti


Hon sucks truly sucks


Thursday, March 4, 2010

You Don't Have To Tolerate Public Corruption: FBI TOP PRIORITY





Public Corruption








Investigating Public Corruption

Public corruption is one of the FBI’s top investigative priorities—behind only terrorism, espionage, and cyber crimes. Why? Because of its impact on our democracy and national security. Public corruption can affect everything from how well our borders are secured and our neighborhoods protected…to verdicts handed down in courts…to the quality of our roads and schools. And it takes a significant toll on our pocketbooks, too, siphoning off tax dollars. Learn more here about our national program and local investigations.
white spacer
white spacer
Report Corruption Now.

Please contact us if you come across evidence of public corruption activities:

Pointer Arrow 
Submit an Online Tip

Pointer Arrow Call our Local Corruption Hotlines
About Our Program

Grey Horizontal Rule
In the News

Grey Horizontal Rule
van with drugs in the backThe Case of the 

Crooked Border Official


She seemed to be serving the nation, but she was really working for a band of drug traffickers for a boatload of cash.
 Full story















Report Civil Rights Violations


Resources


































Grey Horizontal Rule

Color of Law










U.S.  law enforcement        officers and other officials like judges, prosecutors, and security guards have been given tremendous power by local, state, and federal government agencies—authority they must have to enforce the law and ensure justice in our country. These powers include the authority to detain and arrest suspects, to search and seize property, to bring criminal charges, to make rulings in court, and to use deadly force in certain situations.



Preventing abuse of this authority, however, is equally necessary to the health of our nation’s democracy. That’s why it’s a federal crime for anyone acting under “color of law” willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution or U.S. law. “Color of law” simply means that the person is using authority given to him or her by a local, state, or federal government agency.



The FBI is the lead federal agency for investigating color of law abuses, which include acts carried out by government officials operating both within and beyond the limits of their lawful authority. Off-duty conduct may be covered if the perpetrator asserted his or her official status in some way.



During Fiscal Year 2005, the FBI investigated more than 1,100 color of law cases. Most of these crimes fall into five broad areas:



• excessive force;

• sexual assaults;

• false arrest and fabrication of evidence;

• deprivation of property; and

• failure to keep from harm.



Excessive force: In making arrests, maintaining order, and defending life, law enforcement officers are allowed to use whatever force is "reasonably" necessary. The breadth and scope of the use of force is vast—from just the physical presence of the officer…to the use of deadly force. Violations of federal law occur when it can be shown that the force used was willfully "unreasonable" or "excessive."



Sexual assaults by officials acting under color of law can happen in jails, during traffic stops, or in other settings where officials might use their position of authority to coerce an individual into sexual compliance. The compliance is generally gained because of a threat of an official action against the person if he or she doesn’t comply.



False arrest and fabrication of evidence: The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right against unreasonable searches or seizures. A law enforcement official using authority provided under the color of law is allowed to stop individuals and, under certain circumstances, to search them and retain their property. It is in the abuse of that discretionary power—such as an unlawful detention or illegal confiscation of property—that a violation of a person's civil rights may occur.



Fabricating evidence against or falsely arresting an individual also violates the color of law statute, taking away the person’s rights of due process and unreasonable seizure. In the case of deprivation of property, the color of law statute would be violated by unlawfully obtaining or maintaining a person’s property, which oversteps or misapplies the official’s authority.



The Fourteenth Amendment secures the right to due process; the Eighth Amendment prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment. During an arrest or detention, these rights can be violated by the use of force amounting to punishment (summary judgment). The person accused of a crime must be allowed the opportunity to have a trial and should not be subjected to punishment without having been afforded the opportunity of the legal process.



Failure to keep from harm: The public counts on its law enforcement officials to protect local communities. If it’s shown that an official willfully failed to keep an individual from harm, that official could be in violation of the color of law statute.



Filing a Complaint



To file a color of law complaint, contact your local FBI office by telephone, in writing, or in person. The following information should be provided:



• all identifying information for the victim(s);





• as much identifying information as possible for the subject(s), including position, rank, and

agency employed;





• date and time of incident;





• location of incident;





• names, addresses, and telephone numbers of any witness(es);





• a complete chronology of events; and





• any report numbers and charges with respect to the incident.



You may also contact the United States Attorney's Office in your district or send a written

complaint to:



Assistant Attorney General

Civil Rights Division

Criminal Section

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, Northwest

Washington, DC 20530



FBI investigations vary in length. Once our investigation is complete, we forward the findings to the U.S. Attorney’s Office within the local jurisdiction and to the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., which decide whether or not to proceed toward prosecution and handle any prosecutions that follow.



Civil Applications



Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or U.S. laws. This law, commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute, gives the Department of Justice authority to seek civil remedies in cases where law enforcement agencies have policies or practices that foster a pattern of misconduct by employees. This action is directed against an agency, not against individual officers. The types of issues which may initiate a pattern and practice investigation include:



• Lack of supervision/monitoring of officers' actions;

• Lack of justification or reporting by officers on incidents involving the use of force;

• Lack of, or improper training of, officers; and

• Citizen complaint processes that treat complainants as adversaries.



Under Title 42, U.S.C., Section 1997, the Department of Justice has the ability to initiate civil actions against mental hospitals, retardation facilities, jails, prisons, nursing homes, and juvenile detention facilities when there are allegations of systemic derivations of the constitutional rights of institutionalized persons..








Recent Press Releases 



Tuesday, March 2, 2010

JIM CROW SEZ: Stay In Yo' PLACE Boy...

'cus look what we can do to you if you don't:


BEFORE THE PAY CHECK & BEING CALLED A "DIRTY COMRADE":


AFTER BEING BLACK-LISTED AND DISGUSTED WITH OUR SO-CALLED PATRIOTS:

















Paul Robeson
Background information
Birth namePaul LeRoy Bustill Robeson
BornApril 9, 1898

Princeton, New JerseyU.S.
DiedJanuary 23, 1976 (aged 77)

PhiladelphiaPennsylvania, U.S.
GenresSpirituals

International folk

Musicals
OccupationsAthlete, actor, orator, concert singer, lawyer, social activist
InstrumentsVocals
Years active1910s–1976








 
Real Time Web Analytics